Am I really gonna buy the Disney TCG just because it’s got good art?
Yes. Yes I am.
The last post I reblogged brought back to mind this anecdote from my childhood, when my admiration for Ariel went to the point that I genuinely wondered why she didn’t also play Belle in Beauty and the Beast since she was the prettiest out of all the princesses. LMAO
It’s very interesting to me how ATSV told Spot’s story. At a start he’s handled as a joke in the movie. Even Miles and the audience with him laughed at the new villain in his introduction. I was personally disgusted when the bread goes across him. Also, the guy isn’t good at being bad and stealing an ATM, so he can be considered as a joke.
But that left an irreparable emotional damage that shaped him permanently. It’s hard to admit that we as an audience, and Miles did wrong laughing at his face about his new condition. We often mock him when it comes to the bagel joke, but he clearly suffered a lot, and lost it all after the accident. He was being mocked, rejected by everyone, even by his own friends and relatives. He lost his job and was forced to do illegal stuff to survive. These are actual motivations for a person to take the wrong path, and even more when you discover you have a power that could give you some advantage over the others.
All of his story is clearly simillar to what many disabled people live on a daily basis. That doesn’t mean that disabled people are doomed to become villains, no! That would expand more the prejudices towards disabled people. But what most of Marvel villains, and more, Spider-Man villains, have in common is having an accident that left them disabled: Flint falling on a sand dispenser, Max on a pool of eels, affecting their entire lives. (Not to mention that Doctor Connors was already disabled when he recurred to a not so ethic way to recover his arm, turning him into a lizard-like humanoid) But they’re treated as villains, and it’s true, Spider-Man has to combat crime, and in the end, he shows mercy towards them. But in the end, most of the time their condition is treated as menacing and villanious. That’s why No Way Home, brings a fresh vision on helping the villains to get cured or at least treated. (Although, that’s not always realistically possible for disabled people, and most of them don’t need to be cured or treated like their condition is bad for them)
But the movie leaves it clear it was a mistake to not take Spot’s situation seriously. The man might’ve taken it chill at a start, but the more he was mistreated, the more he got resentful specially with Miles, considering him the source of all his disgraces, and more when the Super-Hero laughed at him. His power grew at the same time as his anger, and by the end of the movie, Miles admits it, he’s his nemesys, they’re mutual enemies now, and he’s dangerous. If Spot was treated better from the start, with dignity and if he was given a second oportunity, support and optimum laboral conditions, maybe Spot would be now an ally.
I read the comic in one sitting less than an hour after finishing the movie, and wow I have many Thoughts™.
- It’s very obvious the two versions were meant to cater to different audiences AND tell different messages. I don’t get why people are going “But the comic was better! It had more nuance!” just because Nimona was easier to root for in the movie.
- The comic was written back when ND Stevenson was still trying to process a lot of stuff, so all the characters are morally grey/straight up evil and the climactic battle is between a Ballister who regrets turning against Nimona, even if it was to save others vs. a Nimona who’s too hurt to care if her lashing out was going to hurt innocent people.
- By the time Nimona got a movie adaptation, ND was a lot more secure in his sexuality, so the climactic battle was Nimona vs. the Director, the symbol of religious oppression and bigotry. It’s not just about your friends turning on you because you’re “too much” for them anymore, it’s also about a society that would rather bring itself to the brink of ruin than coexist with you.
- (I totally get why people were upset about Ballister’s surname change, though. Like come on, the media dubbing him Blackheart just to be mean was RIGHT THERE).
- Nimona’s metaphor for not shifting is such a neurodivergent thing. Even in the comic, Nimona’s parents insisting she’s a monster who replaced their daughter is reminiscent of the changeling myth, which is what many parents thought their neurodivergent kids were—changelings who replaced their “real” children.
- Ambrosius being trained to cut off HIS BOYFRIEND’S WHOLE FUCKING ARM instead of merely disarming him is a very cop thing to do. As much as cops claim they’re trained to de-escalate situations, their training still teaches them to treat everyone as a potential threat, and that level of constant vigilance can turn anyone into a trigger-happy/arm-choppy bastard. Even the Director, who can use a sword but probably hasn’t actually fought someone in ages, STILL can’t see Ballister reaching for the squire’s phone without assuming he has a weapon.
- And on that note, the Queen getting killed simply because she was trying to reform the Institution and allow commoners to become knights? That’s the best “no such thing as a good cop” metaphor I’ve seen. Because even if there ARE good cops and they ARE in leadership positions, the system will crush them before they make any meaningful change. It’s not a good institution that turned rotten, it’s an institution that only exists to spread its rot and refuses to be good.
- That’s why Ballister’s characterisation is so different in the movie vs. the comic. Comic Ballister had 15 years to come to terms with his trauma and the Institution’s evildoing, while Movie Ballister is still freshly traumatised and hasn’t found a way to define himself beyond the role he was assigned by the Institution.
- Not to mention Comic Ambrosius was not very noble to begin with and genuinely believed Ballister was better suited to villainy than heroism, while Movie Ambrosius never wanted the glory that came with his lineage in the first place and only antagonised Ballister because of indoctrination he needed to unlearn (which he did, all by himself, after witnessing the lengths the Director will go to just to kill Nimona).
- It really shows how important it is to surround yourself with loved ones who are open to change. Comic Ambrosius can love Ballister all he wants, but he’ll still blast his arm off because he thinks Ballister deserved it anyway. Movie Ambrosius will stop to question what “the right thing” even means, even if he didn’t love Ballister enough to defend him unconditionally.
I have so many more thoughts bubbling beneath the surface, but I’ll probably address them some other day. In conclusion:
[ID: A pink-haired Nimona grinning evilly while holding up a knife.]
watch this. DO NOT look up anything about it. just watch it. it’s only like 2 hours u can watch it on netflix it’s only like 2 hours. do it right now i’m very extremely serious.
The lyrics for Prince Eric’s song, Wild Uncharted Waters, were written by Lin-Manuel Miranda and he made references to characters from The Little Mermaid sequel in the song.
THE LITTLE MERMAID (2023) THE LITTLE MERMAID 2: RETURN TO THE SEA (2000)
So cool!
The most unrealistic part of The Little Mermaid 2 is Ariel and Eric only having one daughter in twelve years. After everything those two have been through to be together it’s really hard to believe they can keep their hands off each other for long
